Re: Emerson Gulf and Rattlesnake Gulf
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 9:49 am
Bish,
Thanks for the reply. Yes, a 28 year old man drowned at the Blue Hole on August 9, 2003. The news report said he was visiting a home on Blue Hole Rd. and decided to go swimming. This means he would likely have approached the falls from above, as Blue Hole Rd. is just upstream (west) of the falls. Approaching from above is not typically the safest route to a waterfall. An inch and a half of rain had fallen that week, not an extraordinary amount, but it is apparent that Rattlesnake Gulf acts like a giant funnel, concentrating a substantial area's rainfall into a narrow and deep ravine. The volume of the shale that this stream has carried away over the millenia is ample evidence.
Talk of liability for any body of water is often overstated. A person can drown in a bath tub or a 5 gallon bucket. Swimming in a waterfall is inherently risky due to unseen currents. The Blue Hole is a deep pothole, and entering such a natural structure during heavy runoff would obviously involve added risk. Yet the scenery and natural environment of such a place can still be enjoyed without taking unreasonable risks.
By sheer coincidence, I was at the Blue Hole one week after the drowning. Nothing was posted that I saw, though I entered the creek from a public access, not private property. I was back in the area in September 2006. I did not have time for a hike, but did observe that much of the property abutting the creek, especially on Blue Hole Rd., was posted. I hope that there is still a safe and legal access for responsible hikers and photographers to reach this very special place.
Here is a photo of this waterfall taken in June 2007 and posted to the web by the photographer: http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2 ... 8158ehHIME
Obviously the drop is large enough that this is no place to fool around during high runoff or rapid water conditions.
Mark J
Thanks for the reply. Yes, a 28 year old man drowned at the Blue Hole on August 9, 2003. The news report said he was visiting a home on Blue Hole Rd. and decided to go swimming. This means he would likely have approached the falls from above, as Blue Hole Rd. is just upstream (west) of the falls. Approaching from above is not typically the safest route to a waterfall. An inch and a half of rain had fallen that week, not an extraordinary amount, but it is apparent that Rattlesnake Gulf acts like a giant funnel, concentrating a substantial area's rainfall into a narrow and deep ravine. The volume of the shale that this stream has carried away over the millenia is ample evidence.
Talk of liability for any body of water is often overstated. A person can drown in a bath tub or a 5 gallon bucket. Swimming in a waterfall is inherently risky due to unseen currents. The Blue Hole is a deep pothole, and entering such a natural structure during heavy runoff would obviously involve added risk. Yet the scenery and natural environment of such a place can still be enjoyed without taking unreasonable risks.
By sheer coincidence, I was at the Blue Hole one week after the drowning. Nothing was posted that I saw, though I entered the creek from a public access, not private property. I was back in the area in September 2006. I did not have time for a hike, but did observe that much of the property abutting the creek, especially on Blue Hole Rd., was posted. I hope that there is still a safe and legal access for responsible hikers and photographers to reach this very special place.
Here is a photo of this waterfall taken in June 2007 and posted to the web by the photographer: http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2 ... 8158ehHIME
Obviously the drop is large enough that this is no place to fool around during high runoff or rapid water conditions.
Mark J